MULTICORELATIONAL SYSTEMS--
TRANSRELATIONAL
INNOVATION INSTITUTE:
AG-RE-CULTURING HUMANITY
From WIKINOMICS
through AUTOGNOMICS to WIKIGNOMICS
At the core of every cultural tradition is a story which
attempts to integrate ideas about ultimate existence (ChaotiCosmology) with ideas about which experiences
ultimately matter morally (i.e. advancing the Value of Human Goodness). When
these stories appear intellectually implausible and/or morally irrelevant,
within or between cultures, they render culture generally vulnerable to crisis.
There is now a critical need on a global scale for constructing a new and
unique Story, a global ‘mythology’, of Human Culture as Whole(Ness). The
central challenge of the twenty-first century will be to integrate a Relational Evolutionary (R-Evolutionary) ChaotiCosmology
with an Ecocentric Morality recognizing the universal tension between Truth by Adapting Presumed Beliefs to Experience versus Truth by Adapting
Experience to Presumed Beliefs. Such a story seems to be forming
around the Epic of a CoCreative ChaotiCosmic R-Evolution emerging from the
absolute need to Re-Relate the Analytical (Inquiry and Inference) and Intuitive
modes of consciousness as MIND.
The
drive to Inquire, being the natural state of the Individual Human Mind, will
generally sustain the individual unless blocked by other’s acts. This is not to
dismiss the constant presence of unforeseen acts of “nature” which can
circumstantially render a person ineffective if not dead. But, in order to
learn, one must continue as an individual to desire to learn.
Yet, the history of the evolution of human forms of collective organization,
from group to community to society and state, evidences a tendency of the collective form, at whatever
level, to emerge as a system with real or virtual centralized control of
its parts, i.e. the people as individuals. This is true throughout
the range of forms of the controller from individual or small group “authorities”
through specialist managers to the rule of the majority. The result is that the
process of inquiry favors the collective need at the expense of the
individual’s self-determination with a resulting diminution of self-motivation.
Recognizing also, however, that organisms of most, if not all forms, have
increased chances of survival through cooperation in collectives, Humanity with
its current emphasis on centralized control form of collective organization
faces an either-or dilemma in its choice between individual autonomy vs.
collective effectiveness. The resolution of the
dilemma requires that we understand that a collective system can also be formed
as being a Cooperative System-As-Whole.
The
last half of the 20th century evidenced a growing unrest with our present
conceptualizations of experience, in particular, in socio-economic, cultural & political organization.
This trend is now rapidly approaching a crisis point which will necessitate a
major shift in world view. An emerging paradigm is one in which the universe in
all of its parts is viewed as a super hologram. The unifying feature is the concept
of the
Whole as a relational form which presences in
each and every part— i.e. where thinking as a part and acting
as the whole IS thinking as the whole and acting as a part.
It is
the existence of the "The Whole as No-Thing", the
essence of which is Interrelated
Relation, which is the novel, unique foundation principle of MultiCoRelational Systems, and is conjectured to be
conditionally necessary and sufficient for Creating Life and Mind as Whole.
One of the most profound scientific recognitions of modern times is that the Universe no longer can be categorized only through objects/things, but rather must be seen as fundamentally relational. If the manifest Universe is relational, then it behooves us to understand how relations relate! From “A New Transforming Symbol System?” by Jon Ray Hamann and Jeanne Pontius Rindge (1978), HUMAN DIMENSIONS, Volume 6, Number 2, pg. 3
Not
surprisingly, one of the most significant remaining unmined potentials is in
the rich base of human, social, relational and intellectual capital to be found
in small (including from one up to a small handful of entrepreneurial persons)
to medium size enterprises. A strong and independent small enterprise
system disperses economic power, localizes economic decision-making, and
protects the potential for voluntary cooperative organization.
THE
NEED in order
to effectively engage this resource is for the creation of new
processes and technologies for improving personal and organizational
effectiveness in “Knowledge Development” implemented through an organizational
and management architecture respecting autonomy throughout its hierarchical and
heterarchical levels by effecting co-intelligence in
a cognitive network for Collective Decision Making to support and extend
Individual Innovation. THE SOLUTION is an Intelligized Wikinomics via a Cognitive Network of
AutoGnomes, i.e. a CogWeb or WIKIGNOME.
IT IS TO LEAD THIS EFFORT THAT IS A PURPOSE OF THE
TRANSRELATIONAL
INNOVATION INSTITUTE
WIKINOMICS-
A NEW ART AND SCIENCE OF
COLLBORATION
[This section is edited by condensation from
Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything, by Don Tapscott and
Anthony D. Williams, Published by Portfolio, 2006]
Throughout
history corporations have organized themselves according to strict hierarchical
lines of authority. There was always someone or some company in control. While
hierarchies are not vanishing, profound changes in the nature of technology,
demographics, and the global economy are giving rise to powerful new models based on community, collaboration, and
self-organization rather than on hierarchy and control.
Millions
now use blogs, wikis, chat rooms, and personal broadcasting to add their voices
to a vociferous stream of dialogue and debate called the “blogosphere.” Employees drive performance by
collaborating with peers across organizational boundaries, creating what we
call a “wiki workplace.” Customers become “prosumers” by
cocreating goods and services rather than simply consuming the end product.
Smart
companies are encouraging, rather than fighting, the heaving growth of massive
online communities—many of which emerged from the fringes of the Web to attract
tens of millions of participants overnight such as MySpace, InnoCentive,
flickr, Second Life, YouTube, and the Human Genome Project. Indeed, as a
growing number of firms see the benefits of mass collaboration, this new of way
organizing will eventually displace the traditional corporate structures as the
economy’s primary engine of equitably just wealth creation. Already this new
economic model extends to virtually every part of the global economy.
The
conclusion from all of this is striking and enormously positive. Billions of connected individuals can now actively participate in
innovation, wealth creation, and social development in ways
we once only dreamed of. And when these masses of people collaborate they
collectively can advance the arts, culture, science, education, government, and
the economy in surprising but ultimately democratically profitable ways.
Companies that engage with these exploding Web-enabled communities are already
discovering the true dividends of collective capability and genius.
To
succeed, it will not be sufficient to simply intensify existing management
strategies. Leaders must think differently about how to compete and be
profitable, and embrace a new art and science of
collaboration we call Wikinomics. This is more than open
source, social networking, so called crowd sourcing, smart mobs, crowd wisdom,
or other ideas that touch upon the subject. Rather, we are talking about deep
changes in the structure and modus operandi of the “corporation” and our
economy, based on new competitive principles such as openness, peering,
sharing, and acting globally.
AUTOGNOMICS-
A SEMIOTIC
APPROACH TO SYNTHESIZING INTELLIGENCE/MIND FOR ENABLING HUMAN INNOVATION
·
In the process of material/energetic
evolution, the origin of sign (=image) is
posited to be a necessary and (possibly) sufficient condition for the
evolutionary origin of life.
·
The greatest innovation in the
history of human life experience,
i.e. language (a sign
system), provided the foundation on which all future progress
of human culture/society would be built.
·
The communication of experience, this being the crux of societal systems, rests in-and-on language
or, more generally signs (for
Systems or Relations) which are acknowledged to be the essence of mind (recognizing the “carrier” role of the
brain).
·
The problem of understanding mind is
assumed to be first [since understanding per se is a function
of mind, it follows that the very process of understanding itself
can be enhanced by first understanding mind, particularly in its synthetic
extension, the AutoGnome] among three of the great cosmic
mysteries—the being, nature and becoming of the Universe,
the being, nature and becoming of Life and
the being, nature and becoming of Mind.
·
Not only is what we can think
constrained by the languages (signs) we use, language use itself requires a
different logic for inquiry vs. inference vs. intuition. This consideration is inherent to the
applied multicorelational premise regarding synthetic mind.
·
We are in the midst of sweeping
global economic and social transformations (the blogosphere and wiki workplace) where creativity has replaced physical
labor and large-scale bureaucracy as the key source of community and economic
growth. We face an information-based, chaotically changing environment in which
success depends on the superiority of continually accelerated Wikinomic Innovation.
·
Synthetic (Virtual)
Intelligence/Mind is also the essence of virtuality (an autonomous semiotic universe
(the cyberverse) in which information (signification) is transferable
(communicatable) only among virtual minds);
thus Virtuality is Related to (Human) Reality through
the Virtual Reality of the Web.
·
It is rapidly becoming evident to
key decision makers that this demand for accelerating wikinomic innovation is only possible through
evolving Synthetic Intelligence (SI) which has
the potential to impact every aspect of human life. The problem/dilemma for SI
developers is that there is no standard,
workable theory of mind.
·
It is the provision of this latter
(the standard) that is the intent of our current development of the AutoGnome as Synthetic Intelligence/Mind and
it is believed that we are in a five year window (2017-2022) as the critical
time during which the three or so industry leaders will emerge as forging the
standard for this Virtual Universe populated by Synthetic
Intelligences/Synthetic Minds.
A BRIEF AG PERSPECTIVE
AutoGnomics
(AG) is a MultiCoRelational Self-Reflective Semiotic Systems approach to
the understanding of the “origin” and “nature” of Mind and the
formulation of a General Theory of Mind and its Special All-Purpose
Technological instantiations as Autonomous Hardware/Software Systems. Application Products generically branded as
AutoGnomes (e.g. the WebGnome as an AutoGnomically Intelligized website) are
generally composed of two inter-defining parts, the AutoGnomic RelationSpace
[AG R-Space] (the relational replacement of the “representational database”)
and AutoGnomic RelationalGenesis [AG R-Genesis] (the relational replacement for
“data-based computation"), or an AG R-Space&Genesis [ AG R-S&G].
WIKIGNOMICS
INTELLIGIZING
WIKINOMICS VIA A COGNITIVE NETWORK OF AUTOGNOMES
Semiotic
Relational Systems
A Semiotic
Relational System is a system of relations exhaustively admitting all forms of
interrelatedness among systems and/or relations and with certain systems or
relations (called signs) taking
the place of (i.e. imaging (signifying)) other systems or relations to a specific mind.
AutoGnome
The AutoGnome is a self-knowing general purpose software system of automated (autonomous) inquiry, inference and intuition exploiting a mechanized carrier system for relational semiosis as a virtual (synthetic) mind.
The AutoGnome is a self-knowing general purpose software system of automated (autonomous) inquiry, inference and intuition exploiting a mechanized carrier system for relational semiosis as a virtual (synthetic) mind.
Intellisite
The
Intellisite (an Intelligent WebSite) is a constructed software environment
(a Website) with an embedded form of the AutoGnome known as a WebGnome, an
intelligent agent residing in this cyberspace environment which, with its
continuous adaptive learning from mimicking the user’s behavior, will grow into
a likeminded replica (MindClone) of a user-self acting in the Virtual Reality of the Internet with
the synthetic mind capabilities of the AutoGnome.
CoGnome
The
CoGnome is a selected WebGnome which, inter-connecting two or more Intellisites
in a Network of Intellisites, provides a computerized collective intelligence,
an automated co-intelligence, i.e. the Collective-AutoGnome (Auto(Co)Gnome) or
simply the CoGnome.
CogWeb
The CogWeb is the Network of Intellisites implemening the CoGnome for Network Decision-Making by autonomously formed Intellisite-defined groups, organizations, communities and societies, i.e. a WIKIGNOME.
The CogWeb is the Network of Intellisites implemening the CoGnome for Network Decision-Making by autonomously formed Intellisite-defined groups, organizations, communities and societies, i.e. a WIKIGNOME.
SYSTEM vs
RELATION
“More than at any time in history mankind faces a crossroads. One
path leads to despair and utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction.
Let us pray that we have the wisdom to choose correctly”. Woody Allen
NULIFYING THIS PARADOX VIA
“MULTICORELATIONAL SYSTEMS THEORY”
Within
R.Elated’s Foundations Purpose of introducing the historically missing
Formalization of MultiCoRelational Forms (Multi=multiple;
Co=interrelated) into the Sign/Communication (Semiotic) Systems
of Humanity and Thoughtsigns’s related Mission of MINDing the World through Technology, the overarching
long term Strategy of Re-Creating A Virtual Universe
as a MultiCoRelational WHOLE begins with the
creation of Synthetic Intelligences enroute
to a Synthetic Mind based on a Formal Theory
of MultiCoRelational Semiotic Systems. This
encompasses a formal algebra/logic of semiosis (currently termed AutoGnomics) and a theory of probable decision making
including a generalized probabilistic optimization principal (now called GnosTeks), all functioning on a triadic continuum
computer data recording structure (R-Space). As a descriptor place-holder, this
is tentatively referred to as an “AutoGnomic (Self-knowing)/GnosTek (Knowledge
Technology) or AG/GnosTeks (AG/G).
Thinking
is a process of relating relations—for both C.S.Peirce and
H.W.Maturana
The
Plan is to develop the Mind Technologies and efforts needed to move from the
current (2017) State of Humanity to the Singularity; that is, to the point of
realization of the technological creation of a smarter-than-human intelligence.
The methodology invoked by AG/G envisions an Open Participation Institute for Fundamental SynMind Research and
Development with periodic Proprietary Commercial Rollouts of Limited
SynIntelligence Applications which will evolve to the point of a self-improving
Synthetic Intelligence that will successfully enhance itself to the level where
it can decide what to do next. The means to this end will require the
Collaborative Networking of any and all voices willing to participate in
developing the philosophical and formal principles, theoretical paradigms, technology
architecture, and applications components needed to build a complete Mind
possessed of general intelligence, capable of self-understanding, self-
modification, and recursive self-enhancement.
RADICAL
RELATIONISM, A POST-MODERN PARADIGM FOR
COMPUTERS
The paradigm of the classical
subject-object dichotomy, where static objects (reducible to atoms) are
connected by relations, is increasingly being challenged today in philosophy,
physics, and biology by a new paradigm. It describes the world as a flux
of pure relations, where objects emerge only as dynamic
stabilities. The input-output model as information theory’s version of the
object paradigm up to now was the very foundation of computer science and its
separation of data and code. In view of the new paradigm technical
developments, computer science now also becomes affected by ‘radical
relationism’, which does not record or process any data in the traditional
(static) sense, but only generates data dynamically from a pure relation space,
like computer generated images of a video game. [edited from Peter Krieg]